Carried interest is one of the most politically controversial tax provisions in the US code. Fund managers who receive a 20% 'carry' on fund profits are taxed at capital gains rates (20% + 3.8% NIIT) rather than ordinary income rates (up to 37%) on that compensation. The difference on a $10 million carry: $2.38 million in tax (capital gains treatment) vs $3.7 million (ordinary income treatment). The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act extended the required holding period to 3 years, partially closing the benefit for short-term trades, but the core structure remains.
The carried interest structure is the standard compensation arrangement for private fund managers:
Private equity, venture capital, and hedge funds typically charge: (1) Management fee: 1โ2% of assets under management annually, paid regardless of performance โ taxed as ordinary income; (2) Performance fee (carried interest): 20% of profits above a hurdle rate (typically 8%), paid when investments are realized โ currently taxed as long-term capital gains if the 3-year holding period is met.
The legal argument: a fund manager receives a partnership interest (the carry) in exchange for services to the partnership. When the partnership sells appreciated assets (stocks, companies, real estate), the gain retains its character โ long-term capital gains โ as it flows through to all partners, including the manager's carried interest. The manager's compensation is structured as a profits interest (a share of future gains), which is not taxed at grant; it is taxed only when the gains are realized by the fund.
Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, Section 1061 extended the holding period for carried interest LTCG treatment from 1 year to 3 years. How it works: if the fund's underlying investments are held for 3+ years before disposition, the resulting gains retain LTCG character when allocated to the carry holder. If the fund sells investments held for fewer than 3 years, the carry income is recharacterized as short-term gains โ taxed as ordinary income at up to 37%. This primarily affects hedge funds (which trade frequently) more than private equity or venture capital funds (which typically hold investments for 5โ10 years).
For a PE fund manager with $10 million in carried interest income (underlying assets held 5+ years):
For a New York City-based fund manager: add NYC+NY combined rate of approximately 14.776% on top in either scenario (since NY taxes all income at ordinary income rates regardless of federal character). The real benefit is the federal rate differential โ state taxes largely negate the benefit for CA and NY-based managers.
State tax treatment of carried interest varies significantly:
California taxes all capital gains โ short-term and long-term โ at ordinary income rates (top rate 13.3%). Carried interest is just capital gains income for California purposes: it is taxed at 13.3% regardless of federal treatment. A California-based fund manager pays: 23.8% federal + 13.3% CA = 37.1% combined on carried interest (the combined rate is not far from straight 37% federal ordinary income). The federal capital gains benefit is nearly fully offset by California's ordinary income treatment of capital gains. This creates a significant incentive for high-carry managers to relocate from California to Florida or Texas โ and many have, particularly from venture capital and private equity funds in the Bay Area.
New York (up to 10.9%) + NYC (up to 3.876%) combined rate: up to 14.776% on top of federal 23.8% = 38.576% combined. Again, the federal capital gains benefit is largely offset by New York state and city taxes. NYC-based fund managers also frequently relocate to Florida (Palm Beach has become a major PE/hedge fund destination) or New Jersey/Connecticut (where state rates are lower and without the city tax).
For fund managers in Florida or Texas: no state income tax. Carried interest taxed only at the federal rate (23.8% on qualifying LTCG carry). The full 13.2 percentage point advantage over ordinary income treatment is preserved. This is a primary driver of the well-documented migration of hedge funds and private equity firms from New York to Florida (South Florida, Palm Beach, Miami) and Texas (Austin, Dallas, Houston).
The domicile change strategy for fund managers: (1) Change domicile from CA/NY to FL/TX โ genuine change of primary residence; (2) Ensure carried interest income is recognized after the domicile change; (3) California and New York will challenge if you continue to materially participate in fund operations from CA/NY offices. The sourcing of carried interest income can be complex โ some states source it based on where the fund manager performs services, which could create CA/NY claims even after a domicile change if the manager still works in those states.
CountryTaxCalc.com is reader-supported. When you use our partner links, we may earn a commission at no cost to you. Learn more about our affiliate partnerships
โ 4.8 verified reviews ยท 3,758 reviews
Carried interest characterization, 3-year holding period planning, state domicile strategy, and fund structure tax optimization require expert CPA and attorney guidance. TaxHub connects you with high-income investment tax specialists.
โ Not for simple single-state returns. Free filing is fine for straightforward W-2 situations.
Get Carried Interest Tax Planning Help โโ 4.8 Trustpilot ยท 1,625 reviews
US expat fund managers with carried interest face complex multi-jurisdiction issues: sourcing, treaty interaction, and US reporting. Greenback specialises in US expat investment tax.
โ Not the cheapest option โ best for complex situations and expats who want a dedicated CPA.
Carried Interest Help for US Expat Fund Managers โ