The Tax Brief real effective rates for 111+ countries — bi-weekly, free.
HEAD-TO-HEAD TAX COMPARISON · 2026

COUNTRY A New Zealand VS COUNTRY B Italy

Side-by-side analysis of income tax, effective rates, and take-home pay for New Zealand and Italy in 2026.

Daniel · CountryTaxCalc Updated October 2026 Tax Comparison 2026
Calculate your take-home → See all comparisons →
OVERVIEW
New Zealand is significantly cheaper than Italy on income tax at every income level — but Italy's Impatriate Regime offers qualifying newcomers a transformative tax discount that can reverse the comparison. At $100,000, New Zealand's effective rate of approximately 29% ($28,800) is dramatically lower than Italy's combined income tax + INPS rate of approximately 44% ($43,900) — New Zealand saves approximately $15,100/year. At $150,000, New Zealand (approximately $48,100, 32%) remains far cheaper than Italy standard ($69,200, 46.1%), saving approximately $21,100. New Zealand's key structural advantage is its absence of capital gains tax on most assets — shares, cryptocurrency, and most business sales are completely CGT-free, compared to Italy's 26% flat rate on investment income. Under Italy's Impatriate Regime, however, Italy becomes dramatically competitive: a qualifying newcomer earning $100,000 pays approximately $19,950 effective (20%) — saving approximately $8,850 versus New Zealand's standard rate. The Impatriate Regime lasts 5 years, so for medium-term planning Italy competes. Italy also offers the 7% flat tax for foreign retirees in southern municipalities — arguably the world's most attractive retirement tax regime.
Section 01

The Big Picture

Top-line rates and effective take-home for a typical earner — including income tax, social contributions, and applicable surcharges.

🇳🇿
COUNTRY A
New Zealand
TAX RATE
10.5–39%
Progressive + No CGT on Most Assets

Progressive income tax 10.5–39% (5 brackets); ACC earners' levy ~1.75% (capped at NZD 156,641); no capital gains tax on most assets (shares, business sales, crypto — exception: property 2-year bright-line test); KiwiSaver 3.5% employee contribution (voluntary); no estate tax; worldwide income taxed for residents

🇮🇹
COUNTRY B
Italy
TAX RATE
23–43%
IRPEF + INPS Capped + Impatriate Regime

IRPEF progressive 23–43%; regional surtax 1.23–3.33%; municipal up to 0.9%; INPS employee SS ~9.19% (effectively capped); Impatriate Regime 50% income exemption for qualifying newcomers; 7% flat tax for foreign retirees in qualifying southern municipalities; 26% CGT on investment income; worldwide income taxed. Italian figures are for a resident of Rome (Lazio); regional and municipal surcharges differ elsewhere.

TYPICAL ANNUAL DIFFERENCE
Moving from Italy → New Zealand at $100,000 annual income (New Zealand advantage on standard wages)
$15,100

That's $1,258/month NZ advantage (Italy Impatriate Regime reverses this for qualifying newcomers) back in your pocket

Section 02

Tax Savings by Income Level

Net take-home after all income tax, social contributions, and surcharges — for a single employee with no dependents.

GROSS INCOME
🇳🇿 NZ TAX
🇮🇹 IT TAX
SAVINGS
10-YEAR
$50,000
~$11,600 (income tax + ACC levy 1.75%; effective ~23.2%)
~$17,700 (income tax incl. Rome/Lazio surcharges ~$13,100 + INPS ~$4,600; on $50K ≈ €46K; effective 35.5%)
NZ saves ~$6,100 at $50K income
$61,000
$75,000
~$20,300 (income tax + ACC levy; effective ~27.0%)
~$30,700 (income tax incl. Rome/Lazio surcharges ~$23,700 + INPS ~$7,000; on $75K ≈ €69K; effective 41%)
NZ saves ~$10,400 at $75K income
$104,000
$100,000
~$28,800 (income tax + ACC levy; effective ~28.8%)
~$43,900 (income tax incl. Rome/Lazio surcharges ~$34,300 + INPS ~$9,600; on $100K ≈ €93K; effective 43.9%)
NZ saves ~$15,100/year
$151,000
$150,000
~$48,100 (income tax + ACC levy; effective ~32.1%)
~$69,200 (income tax incl. Rome/Lazio surcharges ~$56,400 + INPS ~$12,800; on $150K ≈ €139K; effective 46.1%)
NZ saves ~$21,100 at $150K income
$211,000
$100,000 — Italy Impatriate Regime vs NZ standard
NZ standard: ~$28,800 (28.8% effective); no impatriate equivalent
Italy impatriate: ~$19,950 (50% income exemption → only $50K taxable; effective ~20%)
Italy impatriate saves ~$8,850 vs NZ at $100K for qualifying newcomers
$88,500 over 5-year impatriate regime term
💡

CountryTaxCalc.com is reader-supported. When you use our partner links, we may earn a commission at no cost to you. This helps us provide free tax calculators and comparison tools.Learn more about our affiliate partnerships

For Employers & Businesses

Deel

★ 4.7Trustpilot  ·  8,728 reviews

Need to hire internationally or pay contractors abroad? Deel handles payroll compliance in 150+ countries. Trusted by 40,000+ companies. 4.7★ / 8,700+ Trustpilot reviews.

⚠ For employers and companies only — not for individual freelancers or employees.

Hiring Internationally? Deel Handles Compliance →

Interested in reaching this audience? Advertise on CountryTaxCalc →

🇳🇿

New Zealand Pros & Cons

+ PROS
  • No capital gains tax on most assets: New Zealand has no general capital gains tax on shares, ETFs, cryptocurrency, private business sales, or most investment assets. Italy levies 26% on all such gains. On a $100,000 gain from an index fund portfolio: New Zealand collects $0 versus Italy's $26,000. This structural advantage grows significantly over long investment horizons — a $500,000 portfolio generating $50,000 in annual gains saves $13,000/year in New Zealand versus Italy.
  • Lower income tax at all income levels: New Zealand's effective rates are dramatically lower than Italy's at every tested income level. At $100,000: NZ 28.8% ($28,800) versus Italy 43.9% ($43,900) — New Zealand saves $15,100/year. Italy's INPS social security contribution (9.19%) adds to the burden from the first dollar of employment income. New Zealand's superannuation contribution (KiwiSaver) is optional at 3.5% — and counts as personal savings, not a pure tax.
  • Simple, predictable tax system: New Zealand's tax system is frequently ranked among the world's most straightforward — 5 income brackets, no complex social security calculation, minimal deduction complexity, and PAYE (pay as you earn) for most employees. Italy's tax system involves IRPEF brackets, regional and municipal surtaxes, INPS contributions, and multiple available regimes. New Zealand's administrative simplicity reduces compliance costs and uncertainty.
  • No estate or inheritance tax: New Zealand has no estate tax or inheritance tax. Italy levies inheritance tax at 4% (direct heirs) on amounts above €1,000,000 per heir. For most direct family transfers, Italy's inheritance threshold means no tax below €1M per heir — similar to New Zealand's zero. However, New Zealand's complete absence of inheritance tax provides cleaner estate planning.
− CONS
  • Less comprehensive social welfare than Italy: New Zealand provides universal healthcare (public hospitals), but no equivalent to Italy's comprehensive INPS pension system. NZ Super (superannuation) pays approximately $28,000 NZD/year — a modest universal pension. Italy's INPS pension, while complex, provides better income replacement for career employees. Healthcare co-pays and private insurance costs in New Zealand are higher than Italy's SSN in most regions.
  • Distance from major markets: New Zealand's geographic isolation in the South Pacific makes it physically distant from Europe, North America, and Asia. Business and personal travel costs are substantial. For internationally mobile professionals, Italy's European position with EU open borders and direct connectivity to global hubs is a significant lifestyle and operational advantage.
  • Bright-line property CGT does apply: New Zealand's CGT exemption does not cover all property disposals. The 2-year bright-line rule taxes gains on investment property sold within 2 years; this was previously extended to 10 years but remains a consideration for property investors. Italy's property gains are generally taxed at 26% if sold within 5 years of purchase.
  • Less developed equity culture and shallower capital markets: Italy's Milan Stock Exchange and European capital market access provide more diversification and investment options than New Zealand's relatively small NZX. For sophisticated investors, Italy's EU capital market access and broader investment universe may offset the tax advantage.
🇮🇹

Italy Pros & Cons

+ PROS
  • Impatriate Regime — competitive for qualifying newcomers: Italy's 2024 Impatriate Regime provides a 50% income exemption (70% in southern Italy) for qualifying relocators. At $100,000 effective income, Italy's impatriate rate (~20%) is lower than New Zealand's standard 28.8%. Over 5 years, a qualifying $100K earner saves approximately $88,500 versus New Zealand's standard rate. For professionals actively relocating, Italy's impatriate offer is significant.
  • 7% flat tax for foreign retirees: Italy offers a flat 7% tax on all foreign pension and income for foreign retirees in qualifying southern Italian municipalities for 10 years. New Zealand has no equivalent. For retirees relocating with significant foreign pension income, Italy's 7% flat tax regime is dramatically more attractive than New Zealand's standard income tax rates.
  • Lower CGT on dividends than NZ: Wait — NZ has no CGT, so Italy's 26% is worse for most investments. Italy's 26% applies to dividends from foreign shares too. In New Zealand, dividend income from foreign shares is taxed under the FIF (Foreign Investment Fund) regime at a deemed return of 5% of opening value — which at 33% top tax can equal approximately 1.65% annually. For large foreign share portfolios, Italy's 26% on dividends is actually worse than NZ's FIF regime for most investors.
  • Mediterranean lifestyle and European access: Italy's quality of life, healthcare (despite regional variation), food culture, and EU access appeal broadly. Living costs in southern Italy and smaller cities are substantially lower than New Zealand's expensive major cities (Auckland, Wellington). For professionals valuing European culture and travel access, Italy provides lifestyle advantages that New Zealand cannot match.
− CONS
  • Higher income tax at all standard income levels: Without the impatriate regime, Italy's standard IRPEF + INPS rates exceed New Zealand's at every income bracket. Italy saves nothing for standard wage earners compared to New Zealand — the gap ranges from $6,100 at $50K to $15,100 at $100K.
  • 26% CGT on most investment income: Italy levies 26% on capital gains, dividends, and investment income from shares, ETFs, funds, and cryptocurrency. New Zealand exempts most of these from tax entirely. For investors with long investment time horizons, Italy's 26% CGT is a substantial compounding disadvantage versus New Zealand's $0.
  • Complex INPS and surtax layers: Italy's tax system requires calculating IRPEF brackets, regional surtax (1.23–3.33%), municipal surtax (up to 0.9%), and INPS contributions — multiple overlapping systems with different thresholds and rates. New Zealand's PAYE system is dramatically simpler, reducing administrative burden and compliance costs.
  • Impatriate regime limited to 5 years: Italy's Impatriate Regime lasts 5 years (extendable to 8 years under specific conditions). After the regime ends, standard IRPEF + INPS rates apply — returning Italy to being substantially more expensive than New Zealand. Long-term residents in Italy face higher tax burdens than in New Zealand.
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Which country is cheaper — New Zealand or Italy?

New Zealand is cheaper for standard wage earners at all income levels: $15,100 cheaper at $100,000. Under Italy's Impatriate Regime, Italy is cheaper by ~$8,850 at $100K for qualifying newcomers for 5 years. For investors, New Zealand wins: 0% CGT versus Italy's 26%. For retirees with foreign income, Italy's 7% flat tax option in southern municipalities makes Italy more attractive than New Zealand's standard rates.

Does New Zealand have capital gains tax?

New Zealand has no general capital gains tax on most investment assets. Gains from shares (NZX and international), ETFs, cryptocurrency, private business sales, and most investment property held more than 2 years are completely exempt from NZ tax. The 2-year bright-line test taxes residential property sold within 2 years. Italy levies 26% on all equivalent gains — making New Zealand far more attractive for investors and equity holders.

What is Italy's Impatriate Regime and can it beat New Zealand's rates?

Italy's Impatriate Regime (2024 update) provides a 50% income exemption on Italian-source employment and self-employment income for qualifying newcomers — prior non-residency for 3 of 5 preceding years, qualifying employment in Italy, commitment to remain 2+ years. At $100,000 income under the regime: Italy pays ~$19,950 (20% effective) versus New Zealand's ~$28,800 (28.8%). Italy's impatriate rate beats New Zealand's for the 5-year regime period.

How does New Zealand's KiwiSaver compare to Italy's INPS?

KiwiSaver (NZ): 3.5% employee contribution matched by 3.5% employer contribution (minimum, from April 2026) — it's a personal retirement savings account, not a tax. Workers keep the accumulated funds. Italy's INPS: mandatory 9.19% employee contribution funding Italy's public pension system. INPS is a tax-like levy that funds collective pension entitlements — workers receive a pension proportional to contributions but do not own a personal account. For take-home pay: KiwiSaver's 3% is much lower than Italy's 9.19% INPS, and the voluntary nature means workers choosing not to participate keep the full 3% as salary.

Which country is better for retirees?

Italy wins for foreign retirees under the 7% flat tax regime — particularly those relocating to southern Italy with significant foreign pension or investment income. The 7% applies to all foreign income for 10 years in qualifying municipalities. New Zealand's standard income tax on pension income runs at ordinary rates (10.5–39%). NZ Super (~$28,000 NZD/year) is a universal state pension — modest but universal. For retiring to affordable, warm, culturally rich environments: Italy's southern flat tax regime is globally competitive.

How does foreign investment income compare between NZ and Italy?

New Zealand's Foreign Investment Fund (FIF) regime taxes income from offshore shares at a deemed return of 5% of opening value annually — at the 33% tax rate this equals approximately 1.65% annually. Italy taxes dividends at 26% and capital gains at 26%. For dividend-heavy portfolios, Italy's 26% on dividends exceeds NZ's effective ~1.65% FIF rate. For growth portfolios where dividends are minimal: NZ's 0% CGT on realised gains far outperforms Italy's 26%.

Is New Zealand a good base for digital nomads and remote workers?

New Zealand is strong for digital nomads: no CGT on most investment income, progressive income tax starting at 10.5%, simple PAYE filing, and no social security contribution requirement for the self-employed (outside KiwiSaver). Italy requires INPS contributions for self-employed (INASTI ~25.72% for certain categories) on top of IRPEF. Under the Impatriate Regime, Italy becomes competitive for qualifying employed workers, but Italy's self-employed tax burden is higher than New Zealand's for most digital nomad profiles.

Which country is better for startup founders?

New Zealand wins clearly for startup exits. New Zealand has no CGT on share gains from business sales — a startup founder selling a company pays $0 NZ tax on the gain (only federal income tax if structured as employment income). Italy levies 26% CGT on share gains from business disposals. On a €1 million ($1.08M) gain: NZ pays $0; Italy pays approximately €260,000 ($280,000). Italy's Impatriate Regime (50% exemption on employment-type income) does not typically shelter company sale proceeds classified as capital gains.
From the brief
US$2Mnet worth that triggers the exit tax
AT€100kdeferred gains: yearly proof from July
HU1%proposed wealth tax above 1bn forints
The Tax Brief · Subscribe free

More like this, every two weeks.

Verified rates, real after-tax figures, plain English. Free.

Bi-weekly. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.