The Tax Brief real effective rates for 111+ countries — bi-weekly, free.
HEAD-TO-HEAD TAX COMPARISON · 2026

COUNTRY A Sweden VS COUNTRY B Italy

Side-by-side analysis of income tax, effective rates, and take-home pay for Sweden and Italy in 2026.

Daniel · CountryTaxCalc Updated June 2026 Tax Comparison 2026
Calculate your take-home → See all comparisons →
OVERVIEW
Sweden and Italy have similar income tax burdens at €100,000 — but the comparison diverges significantly at higher incomes and for newcomers. At €100,000, Sweden's effective rate of approximately 40.7% (€40,700) is very close to Italy's 39.9% (€39,900) — Italy is marginally cheaper by €800. At €150,000, Italy pulls ahead materially: Sweden's €66,700 (44.5%) versus Italy's €59,200 (39.5%) — Italy saves €7,500. Italy's advantage at higher incomes reflects the INPS social security cap: Italy's pension contributions top out at approximately €9,190/year regardless of income, while Sweden's contributions continue scaling. Below €75,000, Sweden is cheaper due to Italy's INPS applying at 9.19% across most income without a low-income relief, while Sweden's earned income tax credit significantly reduces effective rates at moderate levels. Italy's Impatriate Regime transforms the comparison entirely for qualifying newcomers: a 50% income exemption reduces Italy's effective rate to approximately 20% for the first 5 years — far below Sweden's minimum effective rate of approximately 32%. For investors: Sweden's ISK (~0.45%/year) is significantly cheaper than Italy's 26% CGT on share gains.
Section 01

The Big Picture

Top-line rates and effective take-home for a typical earner — including income tax, social contributions, and applicable surcharges.
🇸🇪
COUNTRY A
Sweden
TAX RATE
32–52%
Municipal 32% + 20% State Surtax + ISK Account
Municipal income tax averaging 32%; state surtax 20% on income above SEK 643,000 (~€56,700); earned income tax credit reduces effective rates substantially at moderate incomes; 7% pension contribution offset by deduction; ISK investment account: deemed return ~0.45%/year; 30% on dividends/interest outside ISK; no inheritance tax; worldwide income taxed
🇮🇹
COUNTRY B
Italy
TAX RATE
23–43%
IRPEF + INPS Capped at High Income + Impatriate Regime
IRPEF progressive 23–43%; regional surtax 1.23–3.33%; municipal up to 0.9%; INPS employee SS ~9.19% (capped); Impatriate Regime 50% income exemption for qualifying newcomers; Flat Tax €200K option for non-doms; 26% CGT on investment income; no inheritance tax below €1M; worldwide income taxed
TYPICAL ANNUAL DIFFERENCE
Moving from Italy → Sweden at €150,000 income (Italy advantage at high incomes due to INPS cap)
€7,500
That's €625/month Italy advantage at €150K (Sweden cheaper at moderate incomes) back in your pocket
Section 02

Tax Savings by Income Level

Net take-home after all income tax, social contributions, and surcharges — for a single employee with no dependents.
GROSS INCOME
🇸🇪 SE TAX
🇮🇹 IT TAX
SAVINGS
10-YEAR
€50,000
~€12,800 (32% municipal below SEK 643K surtax threshold; earned income credit; effective 25.6%)
~€17,100 (IRPEF ~€12,500 + INPS ~€4,600; effective 34.2%)
Sweden saves ~€4,300 at €50K income
€43,000
€75,000
~€27,700 (mixed 32% below + 52% above SEK 643K; earned income credit; effective ~36.9%)
~€28,400 (IRPEF ~€20,800 + INPS ~€7,600; effective 37.9%)
Sweden saves ~€700 at €75K income
€7,000
€100,000
~€40,700 (significant portion in 52% combined bracket; effective 40.7%)
~€39,900 (IRPEF ~€30,700 + INPS ~€9,190; effective 39.9%)
Italy saves ~€800 at €100K (near parity — within rounding margin)
€8,000
€150,000
~€66,700 (majority in 52% combined bracket; effective 44.5%)
~€59,200 (IRPEF ~€50,000 + INPS capped ~€9,190; effective 39.5%)
Italy saves ~€7,500 at €150K — INPS cap gives Italy structural advantage
€75,000
€100,000 — Impatriate Regime (Italy) vs standard (Sweden)
Sweden standard: ~€40,700 (40.7% effective); no equivalent impatriate regime
Italy impatriate: ~€19,950 (50% income exemption → only €50K taxable; effective ~20%)
Italy impatriate saves ~€20,750 vs Sweden for qualifying newcomers at €100K
€207,500 over 5-year impatriate regime term
💡

CountryTaxCalc.com is reader-supported. When you use our partner links, we may earn a commission at no cost to you. This helps us provide free tax calculators and comparison tools. Learn more about our affiliate partnerships

Best for Transfers

Wise

★ 4.3 Trustpilot  ·  287,413 reviews

Send money between Sweden and Italy at the real mid-market rate. 4.3★ on Trustpilot from 287,000+ reviews. Free to open.

⚠ For currency exchange only — not a bank account replacement.

Transfer Money Between Sweden & Italy →
For Employers & Businesses

Deel

★ 4.7 Trustpilot  ·  8,728 reviews

Need to hire internationally or pay contractors abroad? Deel handles payroll compliance in 150+ countries. Trusted by 40,000+ companies. 4.7★ / 8,700+ Trustpilot reviews.

⚠ For employers and companies only — not for individual freelancers or employees.

Hiring Internationally? Deel Handles Compliance →

Interested in reaching this audience? Advertise on CountryTaxCalc →

🇸🇪

Sweden Pros & Cons

+ PROS
  • Lower effective rate at moderate incomes: Sweden's earned income tax credit significantly reduces effective rates at €50,000–€75,000. At €50,000, Sweden pays ~€12,800 (25.6%) versus Italy's ~€17,100 (34.2%) — Sweden saves approximately €4,300. For professionals early in their careers, Sweden is meaningfully cheaper.
  • ISK investment account — much lower than Italy's 26% CGT: Sweden's ISK charges ~0.45%/year of portfolio value. Italy levies 26% on all capital gains, dividends, and investment income outside exempt wrappers. On a €100,000 gain from shares: Sweden pays ~€450 (ISK deemed return on that year's portfolio value), while Italy pays €26,000. For investors, Sweden's ISK is dramatically more efficient.
  • No inheritance tax: Sweden abolished inheritance tax in 2005. Italy levies inheritance tax at 4–8% above exemption thresholds (€1M per heir for direct family). For estate transfers above €1M per heir, Sweden is more attractive. Both countries are relatively benign on inheritance versus Germany or Japan.
  • Comprehensive social benefits: Sweden's tax funds universal healthcare with minimal co-pays (versus Italy's regional variation and sometimes lengthy wait times), 480 days parental leave at ~80% salary, free university, and heavily subsidised childcare. For residents with families, Sweden's comprehensive welfare substantially offsets its higher marginal tax rates.
− CONS
  • Higher effective rate at €100K–€150K+: Above €75,000, Sweden becomes progressively more expensive than Italy. At €150,000: Sweden €66,700 (44.5%) versus Italy €59,200 (39.5%) — Italy saves €7,500 due to the INPS cap. The gap grows further at higher incomes as Sweden's 52% rate applies to more income while Italy's INPS contribution ceiling limits Italy's rate escalation.
  • No equivalent to Italy's Impatriate Regime: Italy's Impatriate Regime reduces effective income tax to approximately 20% for qualifying newcomers for 5 years. Sweden has no comparable introductory tax relief. A new resident moving to Italy rather than Sweden at €100,000 income saves approximately €20,750/year under the impatriate regime — more than the total Swedish effective tax bill for that year.
  • 26% CGT on dividends outside ISK: While the ISK accounts for capital gains very efficiently, Swedish dividend income outside ISK faces 30% withholding — higher than Italy's 26% flat CGT rate. Investors using dividend-focused strategies in brokerage accounts outside ISK pay more in Sweden.
  • High consumption taxes: Sweden's 25% standard VAT and 12% food VAT are significantly higher than Italy's 22% standard IVA and 10%/4% food rates. For everyday consumer spending, Sweden's VAT creates a higher total tax burden.
🇮🇹

Italy Pros & Cons

+ PROS
  • INPS cap produces structural advantage at high incomes: Italy's employee INPS pension contribution (~9.19%) has a practical ceiling that limits its impact at high incomes. At €150,000+, Italy's INPS contribution is effectively capped at approximately €9,190/year, meaning the marginal burden on income above that threshold drops substantially. Sweden's contributions continue scaling. This structural difference makes Italy cheaper than Sweden for incomes above approximately €80,000–€100,000.
  • Impatriate Regime — transformative for qualifying newcomers: Italy's 2024 Impatriate Regime provides a 50% income exemption on Italian-source employment and self-employment income for qualifying relocators. The exemption rises to 70% in southern Italy. At €100,000 income: Italy impatriate pays approximately €19,950 (20% effective) versus Sweden's €40,700 (40.7%). Over 5 years, the cumulative saving versus Sweden exceeds €100,000.
  • Lower CGT than Sweden on dividends: Italy's 26% flat tax on investment income — while higher than Sweden's ISK (~0.45%) — is lower than Sweden's 30% withholding on dividends outside ISK. For traditional dividend investors not using Sweden's ISK, Italy's 26% rate compares favourably to Sweden's 30%.
  • Mediterranean climate and lifestyle: Italy's quality of life in food, culture, architecture, and climate appeals to international professionals and retirees. Lower cost of living outside Milan and a strong expat community in major cities make Italy an attractive long-term relocation destination. Italy's healthcare system (SSN), while variable by region, provides universal coverage and is among the highest-quality in Europe.
− CONS
  • Higher effective rate at moderate incomes: At €50,000, Italy's combined IRPEF + INPS effective rate of 34.2% (€17,100) significantly exceeds Sweden's 25.6% (€12,800). INPS applies at 9.19% from the first euro of employment income, creating a high effective rate at moderate salary levels.
  • 26% CGT on all investment income: Italy levies 26% on capital gains, dividends, interest, and cryptocurrency gains. Sweden's ISK at ~0.45%/year is far more tax-efficient for long-term investors. On a €200,000 portfolio generating €20,000/year in capital gains: Italy pays ~€5,200 (26%) versus Sweden's ISK at ~€900 (0.45% of €200K). For investors, Italy's CGT is a significant disadvantage.
  • Complex impatriate regime conditions: Italy's Impatriate Regime requires careful qualification — prior non-residency for 3 of 5 preceding years, qualifying work activity, commitment to remain 2+ years. The regime has been updated multiple times and requires legal verification. Without the regime, Italy's standard rates are not more competitive than Sweden at most income levels.
  • Regional healthcare variation: Italy's healthcare quality and wait times vary significantly by region. Northern Italy (Lombardy, Emilia-Romagna) provides excellent care; southern regions can have substantially longer waits and quality variation. Sweden's healthcare, while facing capacity challenges, is more uniformly high quality.
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Which country is cheaper — Sweden or Italy?

It depends on income level. At €50K: Sweden wins (€12,800 vs Italy €17,100 — Sweden saves €4,300). At €75K: near parity (Sweden saves ~€700). At €100K: near parity (Italy saves ~€800). At €150K+: Italy wins (Italy saves ~€7,500 due to INPS cap). Under Italy's Impatriate Regime: Italy wins dramatically — effective rate drops to ~20% versus Sweden's 40.7% at €100K.

What is Italy's INPS cap and why does it matter?

Italy's INPS employee pension contribution (~9.19%) is applied on most employment income, but its impact is capped because INPS effectively flattens or caps contributions above certain income levels. At €150,000, INPS contributions are approximately €9,190 (not €13,785 that 9.19% of €150K would suggest). This cap means Italy's marginal burden above €100,000 is lower than Sweden's, which doesn't have an equivalent ceiling. Italy becomes cheaper than Sweden above approximately €80,000–€100,000 for this reason.

How does Sweden's ISK compare to Italy's CGT?

Sweden's ISK (Investment Savings Account) charges approximately 0.45%/year of portfolio value — effectively a tiny annual fee instead of CGT on realised gains. Italy charges 26% on capital gains, dividends, and investment income. On a €100,000 gain: Sweden ISK pays ~€450; Italy pays €26,000. For long-term investors, Sweden's ISK is dramatically more tax-efficient than Italy's 26% flat rate.

Can I use Italy's Impatriate Regime instead of moving to Sweden?

Yes — if you qualify. Italy's Impatriate Regime provides a 50% income exemption for qualifying newcomers (non-residents for 3 of 5 preceding years, qualifying work activity in Italy, commitment to remain 2+ years). Under this regime at €100,000: Italy pays ~€19,950 (20% effective) versus Sweden's €40,700 (40.7%). The regime lasts 5 years. It is not available for all income types, and qualification requires legal verification with Agenzia delle Entrate.

Does Sweden have an inheritance tax?

No — Sweden abolished its inheritance and gift taxes in 2005. Italy levies inheritance tax at 4% (direct heirs: spouses and children) on amounts above €1,000,000 per heir. For estates below €1M per heir, Italy also has no inheritance tax. Both countries are relatively benign on inheritance versus Germany (up to 50%) or Japan (up to 55%). The absence of inheritance tax in both countries is a shared advantage.

Which country has better healthcare?

Both offer universal healthcare funded by taxes, but quality and accessibility differ. Sweden provides universal healthcare with minimal co-pays, consistently ranked among the best globally. Italy's SSN (Servizio Sanitario Nazionale) is excellent in northern regions but has significant quality variation — southern regions often face longer wait times. For consistent quality: Sweden wins. For lifestyle and climate combined with healthcare: Italy's northern and central regions (Tuscany, Lombardy) are competitive.

Which country is better for investors?

Sweden wins on capital gains. Sweden's ISK account charges approximately 0.45%/year of portfolio value — far below Italy's 26% flat CGT on realised gains. For a €500,000 index fund portfolio generating €50,000 in gains: Sweden ISK costs ~€2,250; Italy costs €13,000. Italy's advantage disappears for investment income. However, for dividend income outside Sweden's ISK: Italy (26%) is actually cheaper than Sweden (30% outside ISK).

How does Italy's 7% flat tax for retirees compare to Sweden's retirement taxes?

Italy's 7% flat tax for foreign retirees in qualifying southern municipalities is far more attractive than Sweden's system. In Sweden, pension and retirement income is taxed as ordinary income at municipal rates (~32% effective). Italy's 7% flat tax on all foreign pension and income (valid 10 years in qualifying towns under 20,000 residents) produces a much lower retirement tax burden. For retirees relocating from outside the EU with foreign pension income, Italy's 7% option is dramatically more attractive than Sweden's standard rates.
From the brief
PT20%qualifying work, 10yr
IT€300kall foreign income, 15yr
GR7%foreign income, 15yr
The Tax Brief · Subscribe free

More like this, every two weeks.

Verified rates, real after-tax figures, plain English. Free.

Bi-weekly. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.