The Tax Brief real effective rates for 111+ countries — bi-weekly, free.
HEAD-TO-HEAD TAX COMPARISON · 2026

COUNTRY A Sweden VS COUNTRY B Italy

Side-by-side analysis of income tax, effective rates, and take-home pay for Sweden and Italy in 2026.

Daniel · CountryTaxCalc Updated October 2026 Tax Comparison 2026
Calculate your take-home → See all comparisons →
OVERVIEW
Sweden is cheaper than Italy at every income level shown, from €50,000 to €150,000, under the standard systems. At €100,000, Sweden's total tax of approximately €35,620 (35.6%) is below Italy's €44,511 (44.5%) — Sweden saves €8,891. At €150,000, Sweden's €61,811 (41.2%) versus Italy's €69,324 (46.2%) — Sweden saves €7,513, a narrower gap than at €100,000. Sweden's lead narrows at the top because Italy's INPS contribution stops at a ceiling of about €122,295 of earnings, so Italy's marginal rate falls from about 52.6% to about 47%, while Sweden's tax keeps rising (20% state tax above SEK 643,000 of taxable income). Italy is more expensive at moderate incomes because INPS applies at 9.19% from the first euro and IRPEF plus regional and municipal surcharges stack on top, while Sweden's basic allowance and earned income tax credit significantly reduce effective rates. Italy's Impatriate Regime transforms the comparison for qualifying newcomers: a 50% income exemption reduces Italy's effective rate to approximately 20% for the first 5 years — far below Sweden's 35.6% at €100,000. For investors: Sweden's ISK (~0.45%/year) is significantly cheaper than Italy's 26% CGT on share gains. Sweden figures are for a single employee under 66 at the national-average municipal rate (32.38%) and SEK/EUR 0.088; Italy figures are for a single Rome-resident private-sector employee (IRPEF plus Lazio and Roma surcharges plus INPS, net of standard employment credits) from our verified Italy calculator.
Section 01

The Big Picture

Top-line rates and effective take-home for a typical earner — including income tax, social contributions, and applicable surcharges.

🇸🇪
COUNTRY A
Sweden
TAX RATE
32–52%
Municipal 32% + 20% State Surtax + ISK Account

Municipal income tax averaging 32%; state surtax 20% on income above SEK 643,000 (~€56,600); earned income tax credit reduces effective rates substantially at moderate incomes; 7% pension contribution offset by deduction; ISK investment account: deemed return ~0.45%/year; 30% on dividends/interest outside ISK; no inheritance tax; worldwide income taxed

🇮🇹
COUNTRY B
Italy
TAX RATE
23–43%
IRPEF + INPS + Impatriate Regime

IRPEF progressive 23–43%; regional surtax 1.23–3.33%; municipal up to 0.9%; INPS employee SS 9.19% (+1% above €56,224, to a ceiling of ~€122,295); Impatriate Regime 50% income exemption for qualifying newcomers; Flat Tax €200K option for non-doms; 26% CGT on investment income; no inheritance tax below €1M; worldwide income taxed. Italian figures are for a resident of Rome (Lazio); regional and municipal surcharges differ elsewhere.

TYPICAL ANNUAL DIFFERENCE
Moving from Italy → Sweden at €100,000 income (Sweden cheaper at every income shown; Italy figures on a Rome-resident basis)
€8,891

That's €741/month Sweden advantage at €100K back in your pocket

Section 02

Tax Savings by Income Level

Net take-home after all income tax, social contributions, and surcharges — for a single employee with no dependents.

GROSS INCOME
🇸🇪 SE TAX
🇮🇹 IT TAX
SAVINGS
10-YEAR
€50,000
~€11,054 (grundavdrag and earned income credit; effective 22.1%)
~€18,300 (IRPEF and local surcharges net of credits ~€13,705 + INPS ~€4,595; effective 36.6%)
Sweden saves ~€7,246 at €50K income
€72,460
€75,000
~€22,525 (32% municipal plus 20% state tax on the part above SEK 643K taxable; earned income credit; effective ~30.0%)
~€31,359 (IRPEF and local surcharges net of credits ~€24,279 + INPS ~€7,080; effective 41.8%)
Sweden saves ~€8,834 at €75K income
€88,340
€100,000
~€35,620 (state tax applies to income above SEK 643K taxable; earned income credit; effective 35.6%)
~€44,511 (IRPEF and local surcharges net of credits ~€34,883 + INPS ~€9,628; effective 44.5%)
Sweden saves ~€8,891 at €100K (the largest gap of the four incomes shown)
€88,910
€150,000
~€61,811 (large part of income above the state-tax threshold, marginal rate ~52–53%; effective 41.2%)
~€69,324 (IRPEF and local surcharges ~€57,425 + INPS ~€11,899, which stops at a ceiling of about €122,295; effective 46.2%)
Sweden saves ~€7,513 at €150K — the gap narrows because Italy's INPS stops at its ceiling
€75,130
€100,000 — Impatriate Regime (Italy) vs standard (Sweden)
Sweden standard: ~€35,620 (35.6% effective); no equivalent impatriate regime
Italy impatriate: ~€19,950 (50% income exemption → only €50K taxable; effective ~20%)
Italy impatriate saves ~€15,670 vs Sweden for qualifying newcomers at €100K
€78,350 over 5-year impatriate regime term
💡

CountryTaxCalc.com is reader-supported. When you use our partner links, we may earn a commission at no cost to you. This helps us provide free tax calculators and comparison tools.Learn more about our affiliate partnerships

For Employers & Businesses

Deel

★ 4.7Trustpilot  Â·  8,728 reviews

Need to hire internationally or pay contractors abroad? Deel handles payroll compliance in 150+ countries. Trusted by 40,000+ companies. 4.7★ / 8,700+ Trustpilot reviews.

⚠ For employers and companies only — not for individual freelancers or employees.

Hiring Internationally? Deel Handles Compliance →

Interested in reaching this audience? Advertise on CountryTaxCalc →

🇸🇪

Sweden Pros & Cons

+ PROS
  • Lower effective rate at every income shown: Sweden's basic allowance and earned income tax credit significantly reduce effective rates. At €50,000, Sweden pays ~€11,054 (22.1%) versus Italy's ~€18,300 (36.6%) — Sweden saves approximately €7,246; at €100,000 Sweden saves about €8,891. For professionals early in their careers, Sweden is meaningfully cheaper.
  • ISK investment account — much lower than Italy's 26% CGT: Sweden's ISK charges ~0.45%/year of portfolio value. Italy levies 26% on all capital gains, dividends, and investment income outside exempt wrappers. On a €100,000 gain from shares: Sweden pays ~€450 (ISK deemed return on that year's portfolio value), while Italy pays €26,000. For investors, Sweden's ISK is dramatically more efficient.
  • No inheritance tax: Sweden abolished inheritance tax in 2005. Italy levies inheritance tax at 4–8% above exemption thresholds (€1M per heir for direct family). For estate transfers above €1M per heir, Sweden is more attractive. Both countries are relatively benign on inheritance versus Germany or Japan.
  • Comprehensive social benefits: Sweden's tax funds universal healthcare with minimal co-pays (versus Italy's regional variation and sometimes lengthy wait times), 480 days parental leave at ~80% salary, free university, and heavily subsidised childcare. For residents with families, Sweden's comprehensive welfare substantially offsets its higher marginal tax rates.
− CONS
  • Sweden's advantage narrows at higher incomes: Sweden's tax keeps rising with the 20% state tax above SEK 643,000. At €150,000: Sweden €61,811 (41.2%) versus Italy €69,324 (46.2%) — Sweden still saves €7,513, but less than the €8,891 at €100,000, because Italy's INPS contribution stops at a ceiling of about €122,295.
  • No equivalent to Italy's Impatriate Regime: Italy's Impatriate Regime reduces effective income tax to approximately 20% for qualifying newcomers for 5 years. Sweden has no comparable introductory tax relief. A new resident moving to Italy rather than Sweden at €100,000 income saves approximately €15,670/year under the impatriate regime (about €19,950 of Italian tax versus about €35,620 in Sweden).
  • 26% CGT on dividends outside ISK: While the ISK accounts for capital gains very efficiently, Swedish dividend income outside ISK faces 30% withholding — higher than Italy's 26% flat CGT rate. Investors using dividend-focused strategies in brokerage accounts outside ISK pay more in Sweden.
  • High consumption taxes: Sweden's 25% standard VAT and 12% food VAT are significantly higher than Italy's 22% standard IVA and 10%/4% food rates. For everyday consumer spending, Sweden's VAT creates a higher total tax burden.
🇮🇹

Italy Pros & Cons

+ PROS
  • INPS ceiling softens Italy's burden at high incomes: Italy's employee INPS pension contribution (9.19%, +1% above €56,224) stops at a ceiling of about €122,295, so the marginal burden on income above that level drops (from about 52.6% to about 47% on a Rome-resident basis). Sweden's contributions and 20% state tax continue scaling. This narrows Sweden's lead from €8,891 at €100,000 to €7,513 at €150,000, but Sweden remains cheaper at every income shown.
  • Impatriate Regime — transformative for qualifying newcomers: Italy's 2024 Impatriate Regime provides a 50% income exemption on Italian-source employment and self-employment income for qualifying relocators. The exemption rises to 70% in southern Italy. At €100,000 income: Italy impatriate pays approximately €19,950 (20% effective) versus Sweden's €35,620 (35.6%). Over 5 years, the cumulative saving versus Sweden is about €78,000.
  • Lower CGT than Sweden on dividends: Italy's 26% flat tax on investment income — while higher than Sweden's ISK (~0.45%) — is lower than Sweden's 30% withholding on dividends outside ISK. For traditional dividend investors not using Sweden's ISK, Italy's 26% rate compares favourably to Sweden's 30%.
  • Mediterranean climate and lifestyle: Italy's quality of life in food, culture, architecture, and climate appeals to international professionals and retirees. Lower cost of living outside Milan and a strong expat community in major cities make Italy an attractive long-term relocation destination. Italy's healthcare system (SSN), while variable by region, provides universal coverage and is among the highest-quality in Europe.
− CONS
  • Higher effective rate at moderate incomes: At €50,000, Italy's combined IRPEF + local surcharges + INPS effective rate of 36.6% (€18,300) significantly exceeds Sweden's 22.1% (€11,054). INPS applies at 9.19% from the first euro of employment income, creating a high effective rate at moderate salary levels.
  • 26% CGT on all investment income: Italy levies 26% on capital gains, dividends, interest, and cryptocurrency gains. Sweden's ISK at ~0.45%/year is far more tax-efficient for long-term investors. On a €200,000 portfolio generating €20,000/year in capital gains: Italy pays ~€5,200 (26%) versus Sweden's ISK at ~€900 (0.45% of €200K). For investors, Italy's CGT is a significant disadvantage.
  • Complex impatriate regime conditions: Italy's Impatriate Regime requires careful qualification — prior non-residency for 3 of 5 preceding years, qualifying work activity, commitment to remain 2+ years. The regime has been updated multiple times and requires legal verification. Without the regime, Italy's standard rates are not more competitive than Sweden at most income levels.
  • Regional healthcare variation: Italy's healthcare quality and wait times vary significantly by region. Northern Italy (Lombardy, Emilia-Romagna) provides excellent care; southern regions can have substantially longer waits and quality variation. Sweden's healthcare, while facing capacity challenges, is more uniformly high quality.
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Which country is cheaper — Sweden or Italy?

Sweden is cheaper at every income shown. At €50K: Sweden €11,054 vs Italy €18,300 — Sweden saves €7,246. At €75K: Sweden saves ~€8,834. At €100K: Sweden saves ~€8,891. At €150K: Sweden saves ~€7,513 (the gap narrows because Italy's INPS stops at a ceiling). Italian figures are on a Rome-resident basis. Under Italy's Impatriate Regime: Italy wins dramatically — effective rate drops to ~20% versus Sweden's 35.6% at €100K.

What is Italy's INPS cap and why does it matter?

Italy's INPS employee pension contribution is 9.19% of employment income (plus 1% above €56,224) up to a ceiling of about €122,295 of earnings; above it no further INPS is due. At €150,000, INPS contributions are approximately €11,899 (not the €13,785 that 9.19% of €150K would suggest). The ceiling lowers Italy's marginal burden above roughly €122,000 (about 47% versus about 52.6% below it, on a Rome-resident basis) and so narrows Sweden's advantage from €8,891 at €100,000 to €7,513 at €150,000. It does not make Italy cheaper than Sweden at any of the incomes shown.

How does Sweden's ISK compare to Italy's CGT?

Sweden's ISK (Investment Savings Account) charges approximately 0.45%/year of portfolio value — effectively a tiny annual fee instead of CGT on realised gains. Italy charges 26% on capital gains, dividends, and investment income. On a €100,000 gain: Sweden ISK pays ~€450; Italy pays €26,000. For long-term investors, Sweden's ISK is dramatically more tax-efficient than Italy's 26% flat rate.

Can I use Italy's Impatriate Regime instead of moving to Sweden?

Yes — if you qualify. Italy's Impatriate Regime provides a 50% income exemption for qualifying newcomers (non-residents for 3 of 5 preceding years, qualifying work activity in Italy, commitment to remain 2+ years). Under this regime at €100,000: Italy pays ~€19,950 (20% effective) versus Sweden's €35,620 (35.6%). The regime lasts 5 years. It is not available for all income types, and qualification requires legal verification with Agenzia delle Entrate.

Does Sweden have an inheritance tax?

No — Sweden abolished its inheritance and gift taxes in 2005. Italy levies inheritance tax at 4% (direct heirs: spouses and children) on amounts above €1,000,000 per heir. For estates below €1M per heir, Italy also has no inheritance tax. Both countries are relatively benign on inheritance versus Germany (up to 50%) or Japan (up to 55%). The absence of inheritance tax in both countries is a shared advantage.

Which country has better healthcare?

Both offer universal healthcare funded by taxes, but quality and accessibility differ. Sweden provides universal healthcare with minimal co-pays, consistently ranked among the best globally. Italy's SSN (Servizio Sanitario Nazionale) is excellent in northern regions but has significant quality variation — southern regions often face longer wait times. For consistent quality: Sweden wins. For lifestyle and climate combined with healthcare: Italy's northern and central regions (Tuscany, Lombardy) are competitive.

Which country is better for investors?

Sweden wins on capital gains. Sweden's ISK account charges approximately 0.45%/year of portfolio value — far below Italy's 26% flat CGT on realised gains. For a €500,000 index fund portfolio generating €50,000 in gains: Sweden ISK costs ~€2,250; Italy costs €13,000. Italy's advantage disappears for investment income. However, for dividend income outside Sweden's ISK: Italy (26%) is actually cheaper than Sweden (30% outside ISK).

How does Italy's 7% flat tax for retirees compare to Sweden's retirement taxes?

Italy's 7% flat tax for foreign retirees in qualifying southern municipalities is far more attractive than Sweden's system. In Sweden, pension and retirement income is taxed as ordinary income at municipal rates (~32% effective). Italy's 7% flat tax on all foreign pension and income (valid 10 years in qualifying towns under 20,000 residents) produces a much lower retirement tax burden. For retirees relocating from outside the EU with foreign pension income, Italy's 7% option is dramatically more attractive than Sweden's standard rates.
From the brief
US$2Mnet worth that triggers the exit tax
AT€100kdeferred gains: yearly proof from July
HU1%proposed wealth tax above 1bn forints
The Tax Brief · Subscribe free

More like this, every two weeks.

Verified rates, real after-tax figures, plain English. Free.

Bi-weekly. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.